Crisis impact on the Romanian economy compared to European Union countries


  • Raluca ZORZOLIU Lecturer Ph.D. Faculty of Marketing and International Affaires Spiru Haret University


purchasing power, average gross wages, trade deficit, unemployment rate


The second half of 2008 marked, in Romania, the entry into technical recession, and during the following periods of time the economic contractions led to a widespread crisis in almost all sectors. In the first half of 2010, Europe recorded the first increase, more or less timid, meaning leaving the recession, but in Romania we continue to record an  economic contraction –  in other words, the fourth quarter of crisis. Business analysts and business people consider that this setback was caused by the lowering of the population’s purchasing power and government measures taken or just announced, in the first half of 2010, as well as the bankers’ reluctance to lend to firms.  


• Bulletin of Economic Research, Strategic Investment in a Labour – Managed Duopoly, vol. 62, p. 371-374, oct. 2010, ISSN: 1467-8586, ISI Journal.

• Cerna, S. (2009), The Financial Crisis: The Impact on the Romanian Economy, „Brâncuşi University” Weekly, at C-tin Brâncuşi University, Târgu Jiu, ISSN 1844-0916.

• Dobra, I. (2010), Impact of the Economic Crisis on the Countries in Eastern Europe, OECONOMICA Magazine, No. 3.

• Montagnana, S. (May 2010), The Impact of the Crisis on the Labor Market in Romania,, for labor market previsions and analysis.

• The Economic Journal, Blackwell Publ LTD, 108 Cowley RD, Oxford, England, ISSN 0013-0133, ISI Journal Citation Reports 2009 31/245, Impact Factor 1.902.

• Eurostat yearbook 2010, European Commission.

• INS, Monthly Statistical Bulletin, 6/2010, 1/2009.

• INS, Prices Statistical Bulletin, 6/2010, 1/2010, 12/2009.

• PNDR presentation

• (124/2010, 31 August 2010).

• (9, 11, 16 September 2010).





How to Cite

ZORZOLIU, R. (2009). Crisis impact on the Romanian economy compared to European Union countries. Annals of Spiru Haret University. Economic Series, 11(1), 63–69. Retrieved from