Bayesian analysis of cartel stability and regime switching

Authors

  • Eric EISENSTAT University of California, Irvine

Keywords:

Cartel, dynamic oligopoly, collusion detection, regime switching, structural modelling, Bayesian methods

Abstract

Empirical analysis of collusive regimes typically requires the construction of structural econometric models, with explicit ties to theoretical models of firm behavior in equilibrium. To that end, theory often elicits a wealth of important information regarding the structural parameters, information that is indispensable in accurately identifying desired phenomena, but nevertheless, is inevitably disregarded by classical techniques. Motivated by these considerations, the paper demonstrates how Bayesian methods may be used to better incorporate such structural knowledge through prior probabilistic beliefs. As a result, Bayesian posterior inference provides a clear and precise empirical interpretation of collusive behavior and cartel stability.

References

· Binder, J. J., The Sherman Antitrust Act and the Railroad Cartels, “Journal of Law and Economics” 31(2), 443–468, 1988.

· Ellison, G., Theories of Cartel Stability and the Joint Executive Committee, “The RAND Journal of Economics” 25(1), 37–57, 1994.

· Gelman, A., J. B. Carlin, H. Stern, and D. B. Rubin, Bayesian Data Analysis (2 ed.). Chapman & Hall/CRC, 2003.

· Gilchrist, D. T., Albert Fink and the Pooling System, “The Business History Review” 34(1), 34–49, 1960.

· Green, E. J. and R. H. Porter, Non-cooperative Collusion under Imperfect Price Information, “Econometrica” 52(1), 87–100, 1984.

· Koop, G., Bayesian Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. (2003).

· Porter, R. H. A Study of Cartel Stability: The Joint Executive Committee, 1880-1886. The Bell Journal of Economics 14(2), 301–314. (1983).

· Prager, R. A., Using Stock Price Data to Measure the Effects of Regulation: The Interstate Commerce Act and the Railroad Industry, “The RAND Journal of Economics” 20(2), 280–290,1989.

· Ripley, W. Z., The Trunk Line Rate System: A Distance Tariff, “The Quarterly Journal of Economics” 20(2), 183–210, 1906.

· Rosen, A., Identification and Estimation of Firms’ Marginal Cost Functions with Incomplete Knowledge of Strategic Behavior, Working Paper, 2006.

· Ulen, T. S., Cartels and Regulation, Ph.D. thesis, Stanford Univer, 1979.

Downloads

Published

2010-03-30

How to Cite

EISENSTAT, E. (2010). Bayesian analysis of cartel stability and regime switching. Annals of Spiru Haret University. Economic Series, 10(1), 85–95. Retrieved from https://www.anale.spiruharet.ro/economics/article/view/1019

Issue

Section

ACADEMIA PAPERS